| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Stop wasting time looking for files and revisions. Connect your Gmail, DriveDropbox, and Slack accounts and in less than 2 minutes, Dokkio will automatically organize all your file attachments. Learn more and claim your free account.

View
 

KeyStudyTizard

Page history last edited by PBworks 13 years, 7 months ago

Key Study

 

Tizard & Rees (1975)

 

The effects of early institutional rearing (privation)

 

Aims

 

The aim of the study was to investigate whether institutional rearing in early life leads to behaviour problems and disturbances in affectional relationships. (The 1975 study was actually the first of a series of longitudinal studies that followed children from age 4 to 16 years.)

 

Procedures

 

The procedure of this initial study involved 26, four-year-olds in a London residential nursery. The policy of the nursery was to discourage the formation of close relationships with care-givers and this was compounded by very high staff turnover. There were 3 groups:

  • Children who remained in the institution.
  • Children who, like the first group, had been in care from at least 4 months, but had been adopted before 4 years.
  • A control group was children of a similar working class background but who had not been in care.

Data was collected by using interviews with the children themselves, IQ tests, and questionnaires given to parents/carers about the child’s behaviour.

 

Findings

The findings of this study were that the institutionalised children had the highest score on behaviour problems, but only slightly so. In particular, their scores were higher for ‘poor concentration’, ‘problems with peers’, temper tantrums’ and ‘clinging behaviour’. Their caregivers also reported that many of them ‘did not care deeply about any one’, indicating that most of them had failed to form strong attachments. In contrast, the early adopted children had tended to do well and had generally formed good relationships with foster parents. There were few differences between these and the control group.

 

Conclusions

 

Clearly, the effect of discouraging relationships and the high staff turnover had been that children in the institutionalised group had not formed strong attachments.

 

Evaluation

 

The study has limitations. It is not a tightly controlled laboratory experiment, and the children in the comparison groups inevitably differed in important respects (e.g. gender and racial background). The investigators were aware of the background of each child and this could have biased their assessments. Also, reliance on caregivers’ (and in later studies teachers’) reports is another potential source of bias. Such reports will not be as reliable as actual observations of the child.

 

Back to Deprivation and Privation

 

Back to Key Studies

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.