KeyStudyEatingBio


Key Study

 

Holland et al (1988)

 

A study of Anorexia Nervosa twins

 

Aims

The aim of the study was to investigate if there was a genetic basis to AN. If there was a higher concordance rate in identical twins than non-identical twins this would be evidence for a genetic explanation.

 

Procedures

The procedure of the study was to compare the incidence of a diagnosis of AN in identical (monozygotic or MZ) and non-identical (dizygotic or DZ) twins. All the twins had been reared together (i.e. shared similar environments). They were assessed by questionnaires and physical measures.

 

Findings

The findings were that there was a 56% concordance rate among the MZ twins but only 5% among the DZ twins. The difference was highly significant.

 

Conclusions

The researchers concluded that there was a large genetic component in AN and estimated this statistically to be about 80%. However the fact that the concordance was not 100% in MZ twins (remember these have identical genes) indicates that the environment still has a role to play.

 

 

Evaluation

However all twin studies have criticisms. For one thing, it could be argued that MZ twins have a more similar environment than DZ twins (e.g. they are often dressed and treated the same way). This could account for their greater similarity in terms of vulnerability to disorders like AN. Also twin studies are based on very small samples – only 25 MZ and 20 DZ twins. This can make it difficult to generalise from the results.

 

Back to Biological Explanations

 

Back to Summary of Key Studies

 

Top